> I don't think a single Arch specific file is as simple as some > "standardized" files, where the filename already tells you what it is > supposed to do. Both comments and defaults are allowed and appreciated, > so this is not an argument at all. It is not necessarily this difference but the fact that this bsdism guarantees plain sight whilst almost all other systems I have seen are far less clear and arch was refreshing in this regard in the linux world. OpenBSD has always had an rc.conf with default base provided package settings (almost everything =NO (off)) and an override rc.conf.local showing the name and non-default commandline arguments used, which I love. Fairly recently it has gotten a single rc.d folder for user installed packages which sometimes require longer scripts too. -- ________________________________________________________ Why not do something good every day and install BOINC. ________________________________________________________
