Re: Arch's move to systemd integration

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Arch's move to systemd integration
From: Karol Babioch <karol@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2012 22:04:42 +0200
In-reply-to: <CAPWNY8WAkfVJpriZefeZanUS6OR1v3qRYpJL+1fh8Wx=9gYOxA@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: General Discussion about Arch Linux <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120717 Thunderbird/14.0

Hi again,

Am 22.07.2012 21:54, schrieb Mantas Mikulėnas:
> In modern filesystems (Btrfs, NTFS, Reiserfs), sufficiently small
> files can be stored in the inode itself, taking up zero blocks.

Offtopic: Calling NTFS "modern" is quite ironic ;).

Best regards,
Karol Babioch

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

References:
- Arch's move to systemd integration
  - From: Myra Nelson
- Re: Arch's move to systemd integration
  - From: Karol Babioch
- Re: Arch's move to systemd integration
  - From: Nicholas MIller
- Re: Arch's move to systemd integration
  - From: Karol Babioch
- Re: Arch's move to systemd integration
  - From: Mantas Mikulėnas

Prev by Date: Re: Arch's move to systemd integration
Next by Date: Re: My end-user $0.02 on /etc/rc.conf splitting.
Previous by thread: Re: Arch's move to systemd integration
Next by thread: Re: Arch's move to systemd integration
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux