Re: Still Glibc problems

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Tom Gundersen said the following at 07/20/2012 02:41 PM :
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 10:36 PM, D. R. Evans <doc.evans@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Norbert Zeh said the following at 07/20/2012 12:27 PM :
>>
>>> think the reason why you are having a much more serious issue is that it seems
>>> you haven't updated your system in a long time.  So now you're running into
>>
>> Approximately a month, I believe. Certainly not a whole lot longer. I don't
>> regard that as a long time, but perhaps in the arch world it is. But since the
>> box I'm upgrading often goes a couple of months without even being powered up,
>> it would be hard to upgrade more frequently.
> 
> No, a month is not a long time. I would have thought more than half a
> year (which is still not awfully long, but would mean you would be hit

Definitely nothing even close to that.

I do note that, as I mentioned, /var/run and /var/lock were symlinks, which I
think is a change from about six months ago.

I'm about to try the suggested sequence:

> pacman -Syu --ignore filesystem --ignore glibc
> pacman -S --force filesystem --ignore glibc
> pacman -Sd <everything you couldn't upgrade due to ignored glibc>
> pacman -Su

and we'll see what happens.

  Doc

-- 
Web:  http://www.sff.net/people/N7DR

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux