Re: glibc 2.16 -- just what is supposed to be in /lib now ??

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 07/10/2012 04:12 PM, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 11:15 PM, David C. Rankin
> <drankinatty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > Guys,
>> >
>> >   I have read the recent thread about glibc problems and I am totally
>> > confused about what I am still supposed to have in /lib...
> Nothing, but everything:
> Both "/lib" and "/lib64" should be symlinks to "usr/lib". If they are
> directories, fix that.

OK,

  So then since /lib is very much still a directory and not a symlink, then I
should:

(1)   cp -a /lib /usr
(2)   rm -r /lib
(3)   ln -s /usr/lib /lib

... and the kernel modules for the running kernel ending up in /usr/lib/modules
and udev ending up in /usr/lib/udev -- are all OK with this?  And what is /usr
and /lib as _separate_ partitions on the main box? softlinks won't work across
partition boundaries -- so what then?

-- 
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux