Re: Pacman behaviour comparing numerical versions for package upgrades

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 1:35 AM, Florian Pritz <bluewind@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 29.06.2012 07:50, Myra Nelson wrote:
>> The developer changed his numbering scheme after 1.5000
>> to 1.51.
>
> In that case you should add epoch=1 to the PKGBUILD.
>
> --
> Florian Pritz
>
>
>

Florian:

Thanks for the tip.

Myra

-- 
Life's fun when your sick and psychotic!


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux