Campaign against Secure Boot

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Campaign against Secure Boot
From: Manolo Martínez <manolo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 22:09:57 -0400
Reply-to: General Discussion about Arch Linux <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

Is Arch going to sign [this petition](http://www.fsf.org/campaigns/secure-boot-vs-restricted-boot/statement)? I, for one humble user, would like it (us, whatever) to.

Manolo

--

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Campaign against Secure Boot
  - From: Karol Babioch
- Re: Campaign against Secure Boot
  - From: Thomas Bächler
- Re: Campaign against Secure Boot
  - From: David C. Rankin

Prev by Date: Re: Booting archlinux .iso to take a look
Next by Date: Re: Booting archlinux .iso to take a look
Previous by thread: glib: #error "Only <glib.h> can be included directly." (howto report packages)
Next by thread: Re: Campaign against Secure Boot
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux