On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 17:20:55 +0200 Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 09:57 -0500, Leonid Isaev wrote > > Well, SSD's limited number of write cycles is largerly a myth these days > > [snip] > > > > [...] > The way they're handled might be important in a way it's important for > HDDs too, e.g. does the FS require something comparable to M$ FS > defragmentation? Well, it all depends on a task at hand. Windows 7 is quite efficient on SSDs for a general purpose system. And NTFS, if properly configured, is at the same level of performance as ext4/btrfs maybe better, at least in my experience. > But if a user > needs to take care about read and write cycles for a storage device IMO > make the usage of a computer too complicated. This is a task for the FS, > the device's controller or whatever. Or OS :) > How often does we need a log file after a regular shutdown? If you copy > them for shutdown, you simply can abandon those files completely. System logs are always useful and must not be volatile. > > Just an opinion, > Ralf > -- Leonid Isaev GnuPG key: 0x164B5A6D Fingerprint: C0DF 20D0 C075 C3F1 E1BE 775A A7AE F6CB 164B 5A6D
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
