On Fri, 2012-06-15 at 18:06 +0800, Oon-Ee Ng wrote: > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Heiko Baums <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > Am Fri, 15 Jun 2012 10:17:45 +0300 > > schrieb Chris Sakalis <chrissakalis@xxxxxxxxx>: > > > >> Hello, > >> pulseaudio[1] has that functionality. You should check it out. On > KDE > >> , Kmix supports pulseaudio and I am pretty sure it support auto > >> switching too. > > > > PulseAudio is more or less crap. It still doesn't support > > (semi-)professional audio cards. > > > > If you don't really need it's super-duper extra functions like > > gaplessly moving a stream from one sound card to another you better > > don't bother with PA. It rather makes things worse than better. > > Yes, why not repeat that opinion in every thread where pulse is > brought up? Its not like its repetitive. I agree with Heiko Baums and Oon-Ee Ng, this is possible because ... If PA should be able to solve the OP's issue, then it's unimportant what issues PA could cause. If somebody replies with a guess, that PA might solve the issue on GNOME, because KMix is able to solve it, then a hint, that PA could cause serious issues IMO is ok.