i would advise you to have only Arch and just "deal with it" (hours and hours was eaten to just make something "the arch way") ... but it's out of the subject did you find any solutions? (\_ /) copy the bunny to your profile (0.o ) to help him achieve world domination. (> <) come join the dark side. /_|_\ (we have cookies.) On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Arno Gaboury <arnaud.gaboury@xxxxxxxxx>wrote: > Le 12. 06. 12 21:57, Δημήτρης Ζέρβας a écrit : > >> oh yes, it's not mounted at all, that's why you can't see it from ubuntu >> (arch& ubuntu? how could you? :P) >> >> it's not a problem, just mount the boot partition to /<arch-mount>/boot >> and the /boot partition CAN'T be empty, because you can't login, but you >> actually boot! >> >> (\_ /) copy the bunny to your profile >> (0.o ) to help him achieve world domination. >> (> <) come join the dark side. >> /_|_\ (we have cookies.) >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:52 PM, Mateusz Loskot<mateusz@xxxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> >> On 12 June 2012 20:50, Δημήτρης Ζέρβας<01ttouch@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>> another guy had problems with his VPS... >>>> when he updated he lost any connection with the VPS >>>> do you have /boot on a separate partition? >>>> >>> >>> Indeed, and if it is on separate partition it's probably not >>> getting mounted properly. >>> May be issue with changes regarding using fstab/labels vs UUID. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> -- >>> Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net >>> >>> > As for Ubuntu and Arch on same machine, Ubutnu was a good way for me to > learn. Once I felt comfortable, I switched to Arch, and NEVER LOOK BACK !! > :-) > But I am still a, let's say a n00b++, and this issue is puzzling me. > Yes, /boot and /usr are not on the root /, and you are right, the boot CAN > NOT be empty, it is just NOT mounted. > It seems I can do everything from Ubuntu, but I am not so sure to know > how. I will try to figure out, and LEARN, again and again... >
