Re: [cdrecord] Problems with original cdrecord on latest linux kernel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 10 June 2012 11:57, Tom Gundersen <teg@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> The module-load.d directory is supported by us, as well as all distros
> using systemd. So Jörg, you might consider including this upstream, if
> it is the sg module is really needed.

Tom, Jörg,
nice to see you two interested.

Tom, I don't know much about this modules-load.d stuff. Does it work
with plain udev? Otherwise it wouldn't help much including that file
for users that doesn't use systemd (and I'm one of them).

On 10 June 2012 12:46, Tom Gundersen <teg@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> I could not find much about it, but if anyone is interested I found a
> few sources [0][1]. Notice that the motivation for this stuff seems to
> be cdrecord[2], so it is very strange that this has not been brought
> to your attention before.

Yeah, I'm pretty surprised that the developer arguments with cdrecord
without contacting Jörg beforehand. Anyway, the motivation might be to
use the SCSI numbers instead of random numbers determined by udev.

Lukas


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux