Re: [cdrecord] Problems with original cdrecord on latest linux kernel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Your drive could need cleaning, or have worn out, or in some way have 
been disconnected.  Those kind of drives have to be replaced every so 
often.  If it's a usb drive, have you done a modprobe usbmass yet?  If 
not, that may be all you need to get things going.  If you read dmesg 
does the cd drive even show up as a valid device now?  If not, maybe 
insmod usbmass will fix that and get you burning.

On Sat, 9 Jun 2012, Javier Vasquez wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I've been using the original cdrecord (cdrtools) for more than 10
> years now, however I hadn't burned anything in the last 3 months (or
> even more).  With the current linux kernel image from Arch:
> 
> % uname -a
> Linux jvasquez14 3.3.8-1-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Tue Jun 5 15:20:32 CEST
> 2012 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> 
> I can't get cdrecord to recognize any cd/dvd writer, not the laptop
> one neither an external USB one...  I might be mistaken, but with 3.0
> image I believe things worked (can't be sure, as I said I haven't been
> burning anything for months).
> 
> When I try to identify the cd/dvd writers:
> 
> % cdrecord -scanbus
> Cdrecord-ProDVD-ProBD-Clone 3.01a07 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
> Copyright (C) 1995-2012 Joerg Schilling
> cdrecord: No such file or directory. Cannot open '/dev/pg*'. Cannot
> open or use SCSI driver.
> cdrecord: For possible targets try 'cdrecord -scanbus'.
> cdrecord: For possible transport specifiers try 'cdrecord dev=help'.
> 
> I looked through google, but the responses I get are pretty old, some
> from 2004, talking about early 2.6 kernels...  I found one page (an
> old one as well) that suggests using ide-scsi emulation, but that
> seems to me old as well:
> 
> http://xpt.sourceforge.net/techdocs/media/cd/cd03-DeviceConfiguration/ar01s06.html
> 
> Besides for quiet a while we don't get hdc or sdc, just plain sr0/sr1
> (even the scd0/scd1 was removed), and that seemed to work before if
> I'm not mistaken...  Perhaps now the way is "sr0=scsi"?
> 
> Any ways, maybe someone knows better, :-)  I can try the boot loading
> thing, but before, I wanted to see if someone has experienced this,
> and there's a known work around.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 

----------------------------------------------------------------
Jude <jdashiel-at-shellworld-dot-net>
<http://www.shellworld.net/~jdashiel/nj.html>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux