On 05/06/12 12:37, David Benfell wrote: > On 06/04/12 15:46, Karol Blazewicz wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 10:11 PM, David Benfell >> <benfell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> I *think* you're right. But perhaps pacman-key should give a clue >>> that this is what's going on. > >> https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/28027 If you have time, please file >> this upstream if it haven't been filed in the mean time. > > The decision at that link seems to view this as an upstream problem > and points to https://bugs.g10code.com/gnupg/ as upstream. But the > latter link never mentions pacman. So I'm confused. > Because pacman has nothing to do with generating a key. It is all gnupg...
