On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Sudaraka Wijesinghe <sudaraka.wijesinghe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 06/04/12 23:48, Genes MailLists wrote: >> >> Just to add another fedora link: >> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pjones/Features/SecureBoot >> >> Sounds like they till plan to make use of the UEFI CA $99 signing >> service from Microsoft. >> >> Do you think Arch should follow suit or require instead that Secure >> Boot is disabled? >> >> gene/ >> > > If this is a poll, I vote "Arch should require Secure Boot to be disabled" It's not a poll. I don't see how your ( idea / lack of choice ) is any better. Cheers, Sander
