On Jun 4, 2012 11:57 AM, "P .NIKOLIC" <p.nikolic1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, 4 Jun 2012 15:42:30 +0800 > Oon-Ee Ng <ngoonee.talk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 2:34 PM, P .NIKOLIC > > <p.nikolic1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Since you seem to be in snotty mode that i neither asked for nor > > > required. if the mirrors were up to date then this sort of thing > > > would not happen , So Needs must , I update this machine everyday > > > for several days i have been told nothing to do when i run "pacman > > > -Syu" so maybe there is a mirrors problem sorry but not my > > > department. > > > > > > If there is new stuff out there and it dont hit the UK mirrors i am > > > in the UK why should i use German mirrors . > > > > Yeah, because the best response to a partially upgraded local mirror > > is to whine about how you should be able to use it (in a fairly > > parochial manner as well) rather than:- > > a) reporting it to the person in charge of the mirror > > b) changing mirrors > > c) actually doing anything productive which isn't ill-advised > > > Well the answer once again is simple where is the published list of > who controls which mirror then it would be reportable would it not > > > > > > -- > Linux 7-of-9 3.3.7-1-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Tue May 22 00:26:26 CEST 2012 > x86_64 GNU/Linux I believe this has been discussed on this Mailinglist a few weeks ago and that it is being solved, check the archives. If not, check the arch-mirrors ml: http://www.google.fr/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=9&ved=0CGUQFjAI&url=https%3A%2F%2Fmailman.archlinux.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Farch-mirrors&ei=DYjMT_SxNIam8gOxuekK&usg=AFQjCNFu3dgyVg64-iIHRaZMyqKc6lCp-Q T
