Re: drop slim in favor of lightdm

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 08/05/2012 5:14 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
On 08/05/12 18:35, Christian Hesse wrote:
Hello everybody,

slim has some known security weaknesses (for example it has no separate
greeter process thus the graphical interface is running with super user
privileges) and a lot of open bugs. Additionally it does not support latest
packages (consolekit and friends) out of the box.
Though lately the SVN got some commits and a new version has been released
the arch package has not been updated since it was flagged out of date in
February.
[snip]

https://bugs.archlinux.org/index.php?string=slim

Seems to be a severe lack of bug reports made if there are so many
issues with it...
I had lots of issues when I used slim, but replaced it easily lxdm. slim isn't a default and there are lots of choices available (including other lightweight ones) so I don't see how adding lightdm and dropping slim are connected.
Allan



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux