Re: drop slim in favor of lightdm

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Maintaining slim doen't seem a big effort; I'd stay with lightdm *and* slim
in [extra].

2012/5/8 Christian Hesse <list@xxxxxxxx>

> John Hutchison <heimdal@xxxxxxxxxxxx> on Tue, 2012/05/08 03:53:
> > Am 08.05.2012 03:35, schrieb Christian Hesse:
> > > I propose to drop slim from [extra] and replace it with lightdm and
> > > lightdm-gtk-greeter.
> >
> > Why not just provide both?
>
> I would be just fine with that. ;)
>
> Though it is not a good idea to ship packages with security flaws in
> general.
> --
> main(a,b){char*/*    Schoene Gruesse                         */c="B?IJj;M"
> "EHCX:;";for(a/*    Chris           get my mail address:    */=0;b=c[a++];)
> putchar(b-1/(/*               gcc -o sig sig.c && ./sig
>  */b/42*2-3)*42);}
>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux