On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Kevin Chadwick <ma1l1ists@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 4 May 2012 13:43:03 +0200 > Tom Gundersen wrote: > >> I couldn't find a reference. Do you have a link? As far as I'm aware, >> the only real complaint against udisks2 is that they don't supply >> commandline tools with a stable API. However, the dbus api is stable, >> so it would be trivial for a third party to provide commandline >> wrappers aronud the dbus stuff, which could then be considered stable. >> Is this what he is doing? > > Sorry, yeah > > "http://igurublog.wordpress.com/2012/04/06/spacefm-udev/" > > I sent it straight after realising I'd left it out but it doesn't seem > to have come through yet, ahh wrong from address sorry. So he is reimplementing large parts of udisks because he didn't like that the command line tools does not have a stable api... or did I miss something? Why not just use the dbus api? -t