On 04/30/12 at 09:16pm, Rashif Ray Rahman wrote: > On 30 April 2012 17:35, Lorenzo Bandieri <lorenzo.bandieri@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > 2012/4/30 Kevin Chadwick <ma1l1ists@xxxxxxxxxxx>: > > > On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 11:30:23 +0200 > > > Gour wrote: > > > > > >> we did embrace LaTeX/LyX etc. > > > > > > To get the benefit of your experience. Do you use Lyx as your editor or > > > something else. > > > > Sorry if I "jump in", but as a LaTeX user I usually suggest to stay > > away from Lyx. Basically it's an editor that attempt to make LaTeX > > work like Words, which IMHO it's not the best approach. I suggest to > > use an editor that doesn't try to hide how LaTeX works, and one of my > > favourite is TexMaker. > > > > There is nothing wrong in using LyX. I don't know why you have that > perception. It helps when your writing is qualitative rather than > quantitative (in which case LaTeX and a more involved process can be > adopted). LyX is the only qt (or gtk) program I use in a regular basis, and the main reason why I type xinit at all -- another reason being that elinks sometimes does not make sense of webpages. Manolo
