On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Tom Gundersen <teg@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Apr 18, 2012 10:41 AM, "Thomas Bächler" <thomas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Am 08.04.2012 18:08, schrieb Leonid Isaev: >> > Hi, >> > >> > Cpufrequtils 008 in [core] has long been orphaned and, as you > know, >> > actually deprecated upstream since linux 3.1 >> > (http://kernelnewbies.org/Linux_3.1). Instead, there is cpupower (aka >> > cpufrequtils 009) included in linux/tools and available in [community], > which >> > is stable at least in my experience. Is there anything preventing it > from >> > replacing core/cpufrequtils? >> > >> > Thanks. >> >> Probably just lazyness. Forwarding to arch-dev-public, so other devs see >> this, too. > > I adopted this with the intention of killing it. Let me know if there are > objections. > > As far as I'm concerned the replacement can stay in community, but if > anyone feel otherwise I'd be ok with moving and adopting it. If you move linux-tools source package into core/extra it make sense to merge it with linux package. Cheers, -- Sébastien Luttringer www.seblu.net
