Re: Can you test machine to set --jobs[=N] from w/i PKGBUILD?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 04/01/2012 08:37 AM, Calvin Morrison wrote:
Often higher cores benefit high I/O applications. If gcc is bottlenecking
at reading and writing,  sometimes more threads will help.

How does that help?

Sounds backwards to me


On Apr 1, 2012 7:49 AM, "Vitor Garcia"<vitorlopesgarcia@xxxxxxxxx>  wrote:

On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 13:37:27 +0200
Florian Pritz<bluewind@xxxxxxx>  wrote:

Simple tests (building readline because it's small) with -j4 and -j8
on my i7-920 show that -j8 is around 20% faster than -j4. IIRC
wikipedia states that HT core can increase performance by up to 30%.
This is nice to know. I work with mechanichal engineering simulations
and we have noted that using more threads then avaiable processors (we
have a  2 x 6 cores processors that has HT, so it looks like a 24 cores
server) increases the calculation time on the softwares we have. I
assumed that the same would apply to any intensive task, and we have
even disabled HT on the BIOS. Perhaps I'll enable it again.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux