On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 17:28:25 -0400 Kaiting Chen <kaitocracy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 5:15 PM, Kaiting Chen <kaitocracy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Lukas Fleischer <archlinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > wrote: > > > >> On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 04:40:25PM +0100, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > >> > On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 01:01:03AM +0100, Pierre Schmitz wrote: > >> > > Am 24.02.2012 17:06, schrieb Lukas Fleischer: > >> > > > Apart from that, +1 to this idea. I already checked the list of > >> unneeded > >> > > > orphans and there's >20 packages I'd like to maintain if they aren't > >> > > > picked up in [extra]... > >> > > > >> > > Send me a list of these packages. But ensure they are still orphan and > >> > > are not a dep or makedep of any package in core/extra. > >> > > >> > Well, there's only a few packages left (others have already been moved > >> > or are required by another [core]/[extra] package): > >> > > >> > * bluez-firmware > >> > * cmus > >> > * evilwm > >> > * fortune-mod > >> > * id3v2 > >> > * jhead > >> > * libofx > >> > * libofx-doc > >> > * lirc > >> > * lzo > >> > * msmtp > >> > * ncftp > >> > * pdksh > >> > * perl-timedate > >> > * pidgin-encryption > >> > >> Status? Only bluez-firmware has been adopted yet. > >> > >> > > >> > Note that fortune-mod is an optdep of xfce4-session and id3v2 is an > >> > optdep of gtkpod (I can also maintain gtkpod if no one else wants to but > >> > I don't use it, so this might not be in the sense of this cleanup). > >> > > >> > I'm not sure about lirc either, I'd prefer if someone could adopt both > >> > lirc and lirc-utils and maintain them in [extra] (lirc-utils is required > >> > by a bunch of [extra] packages). > >> > > >> > > > >> > > Greetigns, > >> > > > >> > > Pierre > >> > > > >> > > -- > >> > > Pierre Schmitz, http://pierre-schmitz.com > >> > > > > Ooh I'll take vsftpd if that's available. I use it all the time. --Kaiting. > > > > -- > > Kiwis and Limes: http://kaitocracy.blogspot.com/ > > > > Oh never mind that's taken, I could take bzr, proftpd, openbabel, and vim. > Out of these avogadro which is in [extra] depends on openbabel. > Surprisingly the only non-vim package that depends on vim is archboot and > that is in [extra]. Which means that the entirety of the vim ecosystem in > Arch could potentially be moved to [community] (except for archboot). > --Kaiting. > What about pmount? Since I use it, I can pick it up in AUR... -- Leonid Isaev GnuPG key ID: 164B5A6D Key fingerprint: C0DF 20D0 C075 C3F1 E1BE 775A A7AE F6CB 164B 5A6D
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
