On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:32:50 +0100 Tom Gundersen <teg@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Stephen E. Baker > <baker.stephen.e@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > There are several good reasons for the change, outlined at: > > http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/TheCaseForTheUsrMerge I > > wondered if this was something Arch was considering as well. > > It is being discussed (vaguely related: [0]). While the end goal is > very nice (and KISS), the big concern is with the transition, which > would be a real PITA. > > If we can get the transition right I'd personally be in favor, but it > would require lots of planning and testing. I'm not at all a fan of > the way Fedora is going to do the move btw... > > [0]: > <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2012-January/022463.html> As long as this question popped up... is there a real need these days for /usr/lib64? -- Leonid Isaev GnuPG key ID: 164B5A6D Key fingerprint: C0DF 20D0 C075 C3F1 E1BE 775A A7AE F6CB 164B 5A6D
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
