On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 08:07:10 -0600 "David C. Rankin" <drankinatty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Guys, > > I have found a logic error in pacman (I think). I don't like replacing both > the kernel and kernel-lts in the same 'pacman -Syu' call. So I answered 'no' > when prompted to 'Replace kernel26-lts with core/linux-lts? [Y/n] n'. > However, then pacman fails to install anything because 'linux-lts and > kernel26-lts are in conflict'. > > When I answered 'n' to Replace kernel26-lts, I expected pacman to ignore > upgrading that package (and the others I said no to) but proceed forward and > install the remaining updates. Should I file this as a bug? The full output > is below: > There is no logic problem here. A full sysupgrade is a non-interactive procedure; the only exception is conflicting packages. What if instead of LTS kernel there was pacman itself? -- Leonid Isaev GnuPG key ID: 164B5A6D Key fingerprint: C0DF 20D0 C075 C3F1 E1BE 775A A7AE F6CB 164B 5A6D
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
