Hi Bernardo, On Sun, 2012-01-15 at 19:18 -0800, Bernardo Barros wrote: > `archaudio-preview' is pretty stable, `archaudio-production' is almost > empty. So I should change the order [1]. > I think the reason for that is people who use `-preview' are quite. > > They have some advantages over AUR. You can group install all plugins > (ladspa-plugins, > lv2-plugins etc), and they are maintained by the same group of people. > > archstudio is optimized to intel core i, I use it every day, no problems here. > It will have many packages that live also in archaudio. I noticed this and didn't include it to my repositories. > Would be nice to have more interaction with the audio guys here. So quite... :) Regards, Ralf [1] ---------- old ---------- $ cat /etc/pacman.conf [snip] [archaudio-production] [snip] [kxstudio-free] [snip] [kxstudio-non-free] [snip] [arch-fonts] [snip] [mate] [snip] [archaudio-preview] [snip] [archaudio-nightly] [snip] [archaudio-experimental] [snip] ---------- new ---------- $ cat /etc/pacman.conf [snip] [archaudio-production] [snip] [archaudio-preview] [snip] [kxstudio-free] [snip] [kxstudio-non-free] [snip] [arch-fonts] [snip] [mate] [snip] [archaudio-nightly] [snip] [archaudio-experimental] [snip]
