Re: [arch-dev-public] Signoff report for [testing]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [arch-dev-public] Signoff report for [testing]
From: José Ramón García <Sekereg@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 09:19:49 -0600
In-reply-to: <4F0EF3CA.2080805@gmx.com>
Reply-to: General Discussion about Arch Linux <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111224 Thunderbird/9.0.1

On 01/12/2012 03:07 AM, Arch Website Notification wrote:
>
> * 4 known bad packages
> 
What does this mean? What is a 'bad' package? Why doesn't the sign-off
report say which packages are 'bad'? As a user of [testing] this has
been bugging me, because I don't want to install 'bad' packages.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [arch-dev-public] Signoff report for [testing]
  - From: Ionut Biru

Prev by Date: Re: Deprecated things in the mkinitcpio's man
Next by Date: Re: [arch-dev-public] Signoff report for [testing]
Previous by thread: Re: [arch-dev-public] Signoff report for [testing]
Next by thread: Re: [arch-dev-public] Signoff report for [testing]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux