Re: System a bit broken pacman -Syu exists in filesystem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



This --force seems to do it perfectly, I'll take care. Thanks. Arch rules.

Laurent

2012/1/4 Lars Madson <rwx700@xxxxxxxxx>

> Well, the problem is actually caused by the /usr folder cause it's common
> to the old and recent /opt /var. So the old feel unsync with this too
> recent /usr folder and create conflict cause all the files are already
> there.
>
> The /opt /var will be simply updated if I understand right as the pacman
> database is in /var, isn't it? So the database is also old.
>
> The HDD is dead.  I will rely only on the SSD till I get that second hard
> drive box for laptop. I definitely hate cheap hdd external box, killed so
> many.
>
> So I will use the --force just for this special occasion, so glad that
> option exists.
> Nothing has to be force with arch as it's so slick :P
>
> thank you
>
>
> 2012/1/4 Leonid Isaev <lisaev@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>> On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 20:23:35 +0100
>> Lars Madson <rwx700@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > My system has two hard drive, one SSD with / and /home/user on two
>> > partitions and a HDD mounted on /opt and /var.
>> >
>> > The HDD failed, and the system works with only the SSD as it was
>> installed
>> > like this and then extended to the HDD.
>> >
>> > Only 3 or 4 weeks of update make a difference between the content of
>> /var
>> > and /opt on the SSD and the HDD.
>> >
>> > Now I'm performing an upgrade of the whole system to get back to normal
>> but
>> > all files in /usr are making conflict as the /opt and /var are older and
>> > trying to install files that are already there.
>> >
>> > So I could - but it seems really painful - rename all the conflicting
>> files
>> > (they are a lot), if anyone as an idea how to automatize this. Or maybe
>> I
>> > would love some kind of option in pacman that would overwrite or ignore
>> > those conflicts, I know that's against how pacman is build so I'm asking
>> > here.
>> >
>> > Hope I make sens.
>> >
>> > thx
>> > Laurent
>>
>> You could use the -f option but I wonder if this is more troublesome and
>> time-consuming than a simple reinstall.
>>
>> --
>> Leonid Isaev
>> GnuPG key ID: 164B5A6D
>> Key fingerprint: C0DF 20D0 C075 C3F1 E1BE  775A A7AE F6CB 164B 5A6D
>>
>
>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux