Thanks for the response, but please don't top-post =) On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 4:10 PM, Jonathan Vasquez <jvasquez1011@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I would go with either > > /lib/modules/extramodules/<kernel>/ > > or > > /lib/modules/<kernel>/extramodules/ > > But maybe this is just semantics and I'm just picky about directory > structure. To make it clear, I'm not asking about changing where 'extramodules' goes, as that's up to the devs. I'm asking whether my package (and my own scripts) should be using the 'general' extramodules folder (which they would in the end no matter what). Your first suggestion doesn't make sense because that would defeat the purpose of having 'extramodules' in the first place (so minor kernel version updates do not need rebuilding of modules). The second one is currently symlinked to /lib/modules/extramodules-<kernel>
