Re: a plea for python 2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Alex Bolgarov <alex@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> you all think the proper fix is for
>> me to put in the docs something like "on Arch systems you need to do
>> [x] before building", whether [x] is "get the PKGBUILD with the patch
>> from AUR" or even "run the sed-python-with-python2.sh included in the
>> distribution".
>
> I personally don't think it is a proper fix - I think it is not a fix
> at all. My opinion is that Python3 is sufficiently different from
> Python2 to be considered a new language, not just a new version of old
> (thus it would be appropriate to use new name, 'python3', for it,
> leaving 'python' forever referring to python2). (That is, desire to be
> on the bleeding edge does not warrant breaking existing software)

http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-March/108562.html

... the thread starts here:

http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-March/108491.html

... if it hasn't been linked already.  that discussion led to the
aforementioned PEP, and was generally well-received (hence creation of
the PEP).

> If I were you, I would probably stop putting shebangs into my Python
> scripts (so that they would be not executables), and write a shell
> wrapper script for every python script that figures out during runtime
> how python2 executable is called, and call python2 script using this
> python executables (or write single script with symbolic links to it
> with different names and use $0 shell variable to find which python
> script to call).

you can factor out pieces into separate files and selectively import
based on various criteria, like any other module.  create an small
bootstrap file that is python2/3 compatible and either run/import
according to the binary you're running under, or re-exec under a
different one (slightly rude form a user's perspective, but possible).

a little funky, but you can test syntax using eval:

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/446052/python-best-way-to-check-for-python-version-in-program-that-uses-new-language-f/446061#446061

... and catch SyntaxError.

per:

http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-March/108495.html
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-March/108499.html

... not sure if that's changed, but Arch isn't alone ... there was an
incubation period of a couple years, until 3.2 release, for
applications/libraries to catch up.  python3 is here now, so let's
give her a big welcome, and move on ;-)

-- 

C Anthony


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux