On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Ext3 instead of ext4 might improve something?! It is true that ext3 has existed for longer than ext4. However, most testing is now probably done on ext4, so I wouldn't expect ext4 to be more buggy than ext3. The real difference is that ext4 allows you to mount your partitions with optimizations that might cause more dataloss on a powerfailure than what the standard ext3 options would. I'd rather change the mount options for ext4 than move to ext3. Cheers, Tom
