On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Karol Babioch <karol@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > I've looked around for the last couple of weeks for a package providing > uname26 [1]. However I couldn't find such and in the mean time compiled > it for myself. > > I've also searched for the appearance of uname26 in the forums and the > mailing lists and couldn't find that much about it. > > So I'm wondering whether nobody of you was (and/or is) affected by the > kernel version scheme change, so that there is no need for you to have > this package? > > As it is quite simple to get and compile this code, it wouldn't be that > much of a hassle to package it. However I'm not that much into > packaging, so I wouldn't like to do it, unless I have to. > > I'm not asking anyone of you to do the packaging, and considering myself > to get into it (the whole Arch Build System), but I'm wondering why > nobody of you seems to have a need for it ;)? > > Best regards, > Karol Babioch > > https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/25747 <- people complained http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=be27425dcc516fd08245b047ea57f83b8f6f0903 <- uname26 commit
