Re: pacman new generation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Bernardo Barros
<bernardobarros2@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:

> Perhaps the developers want to take a look at this distribution.It is
> reported that is written in a `purely functional package management'
> and tries to be a highly safe OS, where `upgrading a system is as
> reliable as reinstalling from scratch'.
>
>  http://nixos.org/nixos/
>
> > Because the files of a new configuration don’t overwrite old ones, you
> > can (atomically) roll back to a previous configuration. For instance,
> > if after a nixos-rebuild switch you discover that you don’t like the
> > new configuration, you can just go back
>
> It can be an inspiration for a new version of pacman rewritten in
> haskell? Also Don Stewart's talk about 'Scripting with Types' might
> inspire someone too (BTW since he started arch-haskell I think he is a
> Arch user):
>
>  http://donsbot.files.wordpress.com/2009/01/semicolon.pdf
>

Here's my 2 cents. If you want nixos, just use nixos.

-- 
"Breathe Deeply and Dream"


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux