On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 10:35, Matthew Monaco <dgbaley27@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 11/21/2011 06:02 AM, Auguste Pop wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 6:58 PM, Alex Ferrando<alferpal@xxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> >>> On 21/11/11 01:46, Myra Nelson wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Caveats first: >>>> >>>> I know the package I'm referring to is from the aur -- the linux-pf >>>> kernel. >>>> I'm asking here rather than file a needless bug report for someone to >>>> have >>>> to squash. >>>> I also realize not everyone's whims can be considered or satisfied and >>>> don't expect such. >>>> >>>> However since the pkgbuild is crafted from the mainline pkgbuild this >>>> trivial change would, imho, make the pkgbuild more flexible. Below is >>>> the >>>> section I'm referring to. >>>> >>>> # http://bugs.archlinux.org/**task/11194<http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/11194> >>>> mkdir -p "${pkgdir}/usr/src/linux-${_**kernver}/include/config/dvb/" >>>> cp include/config/dvb/*.h >>>> "${pkgdir}/usr/src/linux-${_**kernver}/include/config/dvb/" >>>> >>>> I understand the need for this as the main kernel builds the modules but >>>> would like to request one small change. >>>> >>>> # http://bugs.archlinux.org/**task/11194<http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/11194> >>>> mkdir -p "${pkgdir}/usr/src/linux-${_**kernver}/include/config/dvb/" >>>> if [ -a include/config/dvb/*.h ] ; then >>>> cp include/config/dvb/*.h >>>> "${pkgdir}/usr/src/linux-${_**kernver}/include/config/dvb/" >>>> fi >>>> >>>> This allows one to build the kernel without having to build the dvb >>>> modules >>>> if they are not required. My build went fine so I think my bash is >>>> correct, >>>> but I haven't tested it with the dvb modules being built. >>>> >>>> Myra >>>> >>> >>> What about posting it as a comment on the AUR page or as a reply on the >>> linux-pf forum thread [1] as they seem a better place for that kind of >>> request? >>> >>> [1] https://bbs.archlinux.org/**viewtopic.php?id=103462<https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=103462> >>> >>> -- >>> Alex >>> >>> >>> >> i thought the op meant to suggest this change to the repo linux >> package to ease all possible abs rebuilds. >> > > This type of thing has always been a pain for me with a custom .config. > To All: Rather than use the bbs I posted the same here on the aur page: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50956 nous's answer says it all. Matthew has it right. The post was here to see about changing the repo linux package to ease all possible abs and aur builds/rebuilds. The change makes (imho) the build system more flexible and hopefully wind up with fewer borked custom package builds that work on one system then have to be reworked when someone wants to use them somewhere else. Myra -- Life's fun when your sick and psychotic!
