On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Daenyth Blank <daenyth+arch@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 12:40, Matej Ľach <matej.lach@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I support this idea. >> Keep most games in AUR and the more popular ones can have their own repo >> [games] on a separate server. >> This server could be community financed using donations and if not enough >> interest will be raised for new repo, all these huge games can be moved to >> AUR and the smaller ones can stay in [community]. >> >> That's my view at it. > Having another repo for large packages is not useful. The benefit of > the old arch-games project was just that we compiled and hosted things > that weren't already in the repo. > What exactly would be too large? LibreOffice? jre7-openjdk? Qt? ;-) I'm with Daenyth here: provide an unofficial repo if you like but don't drop apps that are in the official repos - excluding the nexuiz-xonotic switcheroo.
