Re: xdm, who and X sessions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: General Discussion about Arch Linux <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: xdm, who and X sessions
From: Rodrigo Amorim Bahiense <rodbzro@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 11:49:02 -0300
In-reply-to: <20111011144202.GA2087@cs.dal.ca>
Reply-to: General Discussion about Arch Linux <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111001 Thunderbird/7.0.1

On 10/11/2011 11:42 AM, Norbert Zeh wrote:

Hi folks,

wanting to go lightweight, I just switched back from kdm to xdm, but I ran into
a little snag, which I reported as bug FS#26395 on the bug tracker.  I'm no
longer sure this is actually a bug, at least not of "who".


Why not use 'slim' instead?

--
Rodrigo

Follow-Ups:
- Re: xdm, who and X sessions
  - From: Norbert Zeh

References:
- xdm, who and X sessions
  - From: Norbert Zeh

Prev by Date: Re: update
Next by Date: Re: xdm, who and X sessions
Previous by thread: xdm, who and X sessions
Next by thread: Re: xdm, who and X sessions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux