Re: replacement for clyde

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Karol Babioch <karol@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I'm using yaourt and am now wondering what is wrong with it, when you
> actually know of it, and don't want to use it ;)? Is there any flaw so
> far?
>

At the time of packer first release (January 2010), yaourt was slow and had
some awful code in it.
yaourt also made the choice to accept arguments where it add no value (like
yaourt -R, only delegating to pacman).

I haven't tested yaourt since. I was using packer and now have switch to
pacaur. Both are fine but I find pacaur handling in a better way dependency
resolution on AUR packages.

-- 
Cédric Girard


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux