Hi, thanks for response. I just redesigned the article a bit, hope it's still ok ;-) I'll have a look at that imagemagick's opencl, I'll see what I can find out... ~kralyk 2011/8/9 XeCycle <xecycle@xxxxxxxxx>: > Vojtěch Král <kral.vojtech@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> Hey everyone,... >> From recent discussions about troubles with OpenCL as well as >> comments in AUR, >> forums, etc.. I got the impression that the whole thing is pretty >> confusing for an outsider... and for an insider too for that matter. >> So I put up a wiki entry. >> >> So far it's a wip article on my wiki profile here: >> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/User:Kralyk/GPGPU >> >> I'd like you to >> + have a look at it and tell me what you think of it ;-) > > Nice work. Well, yes, CUDA is missing. > >> + check if my wording is tolerable enough - English isn't my native >> language, feel free to correct > > I think it OK, I'm not native English speaker either. > >> + See if you know anything about the (missing) Nvidia/CUDA parts >> I myself am not really acquainted with CUDA and Nvidia-flavoured OpenCL >> so I'd like to ask if someone CUDA-savvy out there would be so kind as >> to help out and fill in those gaps. > > But I don't know that --- I have an ATI card myself. > >> Regards, >> ~kralyk > > I learned that ImageMagick supports OpenCL processing, and I tried with > my card, but failed. Those samples from amdstream worked fine, but > ImageMagick always failed with it. Could you please write something on > that? And perhaps more on other software that supports OpenCL. > > -- > Carl Lei (XeCycle) > Department of Physics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University > OpenPGP public key: 7795E591 > Fingerprint: 1FB6 7F1F D45D F681 C845 27F7 8D71 8EC4 7795 E591 >