Am 06.08.2011 18:27, schrieb Myra Nelson: > On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 10:58, Thomas Bächler <thomas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> please signoff the 3.0 series for both architectures. >> >> Note: the upgrade path from 3.0-2 to 3.0.1-1 is not entirely smooth if >> you rely on the vmlinuz26 compat symlink. However, the upgrade path from >> core/kernel26 to this version is smooth. >> >> Upstream changes: >> http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges >> >> Arch Linux Changes: >> - Rename the package: kernel26 -> linux >> - Added necessary replaces=(...) >> - Removed old comments and vercmps from .install file >> - Removed old comments and replaces from PKGBUILD >> - added compatibility symlinks for the old kernel and initramfs >> filenames in order to not break existing bootloader entries (only >> affects upgrades, not new installations) >> - removed System.map file, not needed anymore as we provide >> /proc/kallsyms >> > > I haven't upgraded from 3.0-2 to 3.0.1-1 yet, but thought I would get > some clarification. I'm assuming the reference to fixing your > bootloader means having edited the kernel and initramfs lines to point > to vmlinuz-linux and initramfs-linux.img and > initramfs-fallback-linux.img. The reason for clarification is, we all > know when one assumes something you make an "ass out of u and me". > > If that's correct I should have it made, it's the first thing I did > when I installed the new linux 3.0 kernel. > > Myra You are right.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
