Am Tue, 19 Jul 2011 17:12:06 +0300 schrieb Ionut Biru <ibiru@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > I've been criticized a lot because I choose poorly the name for guest > additions. > > Right now the packages are like this: > > virtualbox-addtitions - contains the iso with guest additions for > linux/windows/etc and is installed on host > virtualbox-guest-additions - contains guest additions only for an > arch linux system as guest. > virtualbo-guest-modules - modules only for an arch linux system as > guest. > > Now that virtualbox 4.1 is released I need help choosing this names. I'd suggest these names: virtualbox-additions -> virtualbox-guest-additions (That's how upstream calls it officially.) virtualbox-guest-additions -> virtualbox-arch-additions or virtualbox-arch-guest-additions (This way everybody knows that it's Arch related. Btw., I still doubt that this package is really necessary.) virtualbox-guest-modules -> virtualbox-arch-modules or virtualbox-arch-guest-modules (Seems to be Arch related, too. But what is it for? Isn't this included in virtualbox-additions and virtualbox-arch-guest-additions (the old names) anyway?) I guess these names are the most unambiguous names. But, please, don't make a virtualbox group. Heiko
