On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 05:03:05PM +0200, Vic Demuzere wrote: > On 19 July 2011 16:18, Magnus Therning <magnus@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I think that the guest/host terminology is rather well established, so > > maybe > > > > virtualbox-host-additions > > virtualbox-guest-additions > > virtualbox-guest-modules > > > > I don't like this. It sounds as if the first package has additions for > the host, but it's just an iso containing additions for the guest. It > doesn't make sense to name it this way. > > What about > > virtualbox-additions > virtualbox-arch-additions > virtualbox-arch-modules I see your point, but I don't like your suggestion since there is no indication *where* it makes sense to install the packages. It's worth making it crystal clear that guest additions and guest modules only make sense in a guest, and that it's pointless to install the ISO packages in one. /M -- Magnus Therning OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4 email: magnus@xxxxxxxxxxxx jabber: magnus@xxxxxxxxxxxx twitter: magthe http://therning.org/magnus Most software today is very much like an Egyptian pyramid with millions of bricks piled on top of each other, with no structural integrity, but just done by brute force and thousands of slaves. -- Alan Kay
Attachment:
pgpKsw3LaavlV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
