Re: [arch-dev-public] dropping tcp_wrapper support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



I also use the hosts.allow and hosts.deny files. It's a shame that support
for them will be removed. It's easier than iptables.

-- 
vic@xxxxxxxxxxx :: http://vic.demuzere.be :: PGP: 0x6690CF94
My software never contains bugs, it just develops random features.

Sent from my phone, please excuse my brevity.
On Jul 16, 2011 7:06 PM, "Peggy Wilkins" <enlil65@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I am an end user who is very unhappy about the removal of this option.
> I didn't even know dropping tcp_wrappers was under consideration; had
> I known that I would have spoken up with my vote against removing
> support.
>
> The annoucement suggests that a major reason for dropping support is
> that it is "confusing" to end users. An easy solution to that is to
> make a default hosts.allow file that says "ALL : ALL : ALLOW" out of
> the box. Then those of use wanting to simply restrict access (useful
> in many scenarios) can change that default as needed.
>
> IMO for users who want to use this feature, the burden is on the end
> user to find which services support tcp wrappers and which don't. A
> default "allow" policy makes this simple.
>
> Surely I'm not the only tcp wrappers user out there. I will sorely
> miss this option and strongly wish it to remain.


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux