Re: Outdated install media (2010-05)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Thanks for your explanation, what i worry about is the install media
available for download from archlinux.org website, as it is more than
one year old.

I looked through the feedback site at
http://www.archlinux.org/releng/feedback/architecture/1/
but wasn't able to find WHAT exactly failed for each installation report.

Are there significant bugs in all the install media from the last 14
months that keeps us from using one of those as default install media?

I just try to understand why it makes sense to still offer a 14 months
old there...

- Armin




On 07/11/2011 09:55 PM, Bogdan Ionuț wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 21:58, Darkbyte <darkbyte.org@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> Is there anything we could do about the extremely outdated install media?
>>
> 
> you can create a custom iso yourself.
> 
> http://projects.archlinux.org/archiso.git/plain/README


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux