On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Thomas Bächler <thomas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Am 04.06.2011 23:48, schrieb C Anthony Risinger: >> Separate /usr is 100% historical AFAICT ... per systemd it's unsupported, > > It is historical, yes. > >> and IIRC its not perfect supported on any distro for a variety of reasons. > > I run several SuSE machines with /usr on a separate partition. Works > fine. And right now, Arch should also work. oh for sure ... i only meant that one consensus *seems* to be that it's mostly non-beneficial/etc., but that's of course only based on the tiny sliver-of-a-sample i've managed to procure from the interwebs :-) ... although, tbh, i always thought it seemed pointless from day 1, but never thought much of it. i personally like the idea of merging everything *into* /usr, and letting things fade from /. per your message Tom, i was referencing this + similar: http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/separate-usr-is-broken ... and meant exactly what you said, i guess i should have been more clear ... typing on mobile tends to make my responses much more terse :-) i think consensus on that front however is "it's unsupported, try again without" buuuut that's all irrelevant to this thread, so i'll throw down some more when someone starts a "why don't we just merge /*bin, /lib*, into /usr, and maybe even rethink /etc?" thread ;-) ................ C Anthony