Am 25.05.2011 17:20, schrieb Bernardo Barros: > Hi there, > > There are rumors that the next version number of the Linux Kernel is > going to be 3.0. > Since we choosed 'kernel26' as the package name, we will have to > modify it anyway. > Why not just 'linux 3.0'? Just an idea.. since we have the fellow > project 'Arch Hurd' providing 'hurd' as an alternative different > kernel already. This is a non-issue. The package name was wrong all along, so why not let it remain wrong? There are always potential problems with replacing packages, in this case the backup-file /etc/mkinitcpio.d/kernel26.preset which will not be kept with such a change. Changing file names in /boot is another such problem. That said, at some point we might fix that name, and the package name should be 'linux', of course.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
