On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 10:54 AM, |^ `/ () () | ( (-) | <ryooichi+arch@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Thomas, if you simply surf to http://is.gd/Tn8wBO,and omit the last four > packages (because they do not begin with "archtrack"), you will have your > list with links. > > Evangelos, the reason for the deletion is that I'm refactoring my approach > and these packages are no longer needed. They really just psuedo-packages > anyway. > > Btw, why is it that package maintainers can't just delete their own > packages? > deleted
