Re: Display Manager rc.d scripts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 05/08/2011 08:19 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
Hello,
can anyone think of a reason the rc.d scripts are added to kdm, gdm and
slim? They are not recommended by anyone&  they are to be blame for
occasional weird problems. The standard and IMO only way is to start
them from inittab.
They dont come from upstream&  i dont know when they were added, i
remember them being there ever since i started using Arch, they may
come from CRUX or something.
I am considering requesting them removal from all display managers.
In [0] Pierre said some people want to keep them for backwards
compatibility. Backwards compatibility is desired only when something
works correctly. Thoughts?

[0]: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/20109

So, lemme get this straight. You don't like the daemon method, therefore it should be removed? "they are to be blame for occasional weird problems" — not good enough.

On 05/08/2011 08:19 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
>The standard and IMO only way is to start
>them from inittab.
Well obviously it's not the only one, whether you like it or not.

Nobody is forcing you to use the daemon method, there is no "default" (as someone already said).

On 05/08/2011 04:21 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
> Heiko Baums wrote:
>> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Start_X_at_boot
> Thats the worst wiki page i've ever seen, on any wiki.

It's a public wiki, fix it, if you think it's bad.

--
cantabile

"Jayne is a girl's name." -- River


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux