Re: Gnome 3, a bug?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 05/05/2011 01:43 AM, Magnus Therning wrote:
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 07:38, Casey Peter<caseyjp1@xxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
On 05/04/2011 11:56 PM, Magnus Therning wrote:
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 17:54, Damien Churchill<damoxc@xxxxxxxxx>    wrote:
You can disable extensions, taken from the Gnome Shell extensions page
[1]

"Per-user and systemwide extensions can be disabled with the GSettings
key org.gnome.shell.disabled-extensions"

[1] http://live.gnome.org/GnomeShell/Extensions
Yes, indeed it does say that, but it doesn't say how to actually
disable them :-)

I've tried to disable AlternateTab without success.  Here's what I've
tried so far:

% gsettings set org.gnome.shell disabled-extensions "@as ['AlternateTab']
% gsettings set org.gnome.shell disabled-extensions "@as ['alternate-tab']

Has anyone else managed to disable extensions?

/M

Yes.  Disabling the extension is pretty simple.  Just go into the
/usr/share/gnome-shell/extensions directory, rename the extension folder to
.backup or something like .disabled. (just keep the original folder name in
case you want to re-enable later).  You can then do an alt-f2 "lg" and enter
and go to the extensions tab to verify what is/is not there.  To make the
change alt+f2 "r" enter to restart the gnome-shell.
I'd very much like to avoid doing something like that, because it's
"icky".  Renaming a system directory, owned by an installed package?
That's not good practice for system administration in my opinion.  The
Gnome 3 docs say it's possible to disable installed extensions on a
per-user basis, I'd much prefer doing it that way.

/M

It might be "icky", but you asked a question...I answered it. I have it working and do it that way for now, it works a charm, as some of those extensions I am not fond of, having gotten used to the defaults during the testing phase. Adding a .xxx to the end of the file disables it and keeps the basic folder name structure intact so later if I want it back "on" I know exactly what to change.

The package(s) are in AUR anyway, and until we get a better method of handling the stuff, this works for me. As for good practice...its my own machine in my own home, and I know what goes on in exquisite detail on that box...so hey. :D (not knocking what you are saying for sys admin purposes.)


I really do like the looking glass tool though. That is one nifty little idsoftware kinda tool. :-)

Casey


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux