Re: Gnome 3 + KDE 4 are both large disappointments.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: General Discussion about Arch Linux <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Gnome 3 + KDE 4 are both large disappointments.
From: SanskritFritz <sanskritfritz@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 10:49:18 +0200
In-reply-to: <4DA1B63A.7070706@pyther.net>
Reply-to: General Discussion about Arch Linux <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Matthew Gyurgyik <pyther@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 2. Next time, please create a new mail, instead of replying to an existing
> thread and changing the topic
>

What's wrong with that?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Gnome 3 + KDE 4 are both large disappointments.
  - From: Oon-Ee Ng

References:
- Can't run gnome 3
  - From: Madhurya Kakati
- Re: Can't run gnome 3
  - From: Ionuț Bîru
- Gnome 3 + KDE 4 are both large disappointments.
  - From: Dennis Beekman
- Re: Gnome 3 + KDE 4 are both large disappointments.
  - From: Matthew Gyurgyik

Prev by Date: Re: Using "python3 setup.py" in PKGBUILDs
Next by Date: kernel26-2.6.38.2-1 and lilo
Previous by thread: Re: Gnome 3 + KDE 4 are both large disappointments.
Next by thread: Re: Gnome 3 + KDE 4 are both large disappointments.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux