Re: Gnome 3 + KDE 4 are both large disappointments.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Hello Fellow Archers,

Most people say that Arch is cutting edge and saving GNOME2 as gnome2 is not
the the Arch way. I know that packaging and maintaining GNOME2 is a hard
task that no devs would want to take care of and that we'll most likely be
seeing unofficial repositories but what about python? Despite the upstream
python is 3.x, we still have python2 for failback? So is that the Arch way?

I believe there's no need to say that preserving GNOME2 is not the Arch way.
It's also unreliable and unwanted to use the unstable repository to test
GNOME3 since it's probably not ready for end users imho. We'll see better
integration soon.

---
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux