> cronie also appears to be the nicest migration choice for users who are > not used to fcron. It seems to support anachron features, cron.d, > daily/weekly/etc, is able to actually keep time and works just like > expected whereas fcron has fcrontab with a slightly different syntax. We > could actually make cronie replace dcron. > > fcron would be nice but it is not a drop in like cronie. What do you > say? If you agree, I shall make (or somebody who steps up) a plan to the > replacement and that's that. > > -- Sven-Hendrik > I agree with Sven, the more I look into it the more I think that cronie is the right way to go for a default cron daemon. With that said, the more I have learned about fcron the more I have liked it! +1
