On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 08:41:13AM +0200, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: > packages we know are broken by putting them into the base group. Perhaps > fcron is a fine choice. > > Bug report for reference: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/18681 It surely would be great for fcron to replace dcron, since being lightweight in size or footprint fcron is not much different from dcron (that is, if cut off the HTML manuals). Plus that fcron has much richer facility and configurability than dcron as well. One could set whether to mail or not, or use a literal english word to specify a time or date period. And, it has really GOOD manual. -- Li Ian-Xue http://b4283.ath.cx
